For applicants, recipients, and subrecipients that are required to submit transparency of foreign connections disclosures, DOE provides this format for the convenience of the entity providing the disclosure and certification; however, the entity is not required to use this specific format. If another format is used, the signatory must include the same substantive information, a signature, date, and the certification statement provided in Section 3 of the document.
A chart that compares federal laws, regulations, and policies in the area of science and security. The chart is divided into three separate tabs that cover (a) major federal-wide legislation or policy, (b) agency disclosure requirements for researchers and research institutions; and (c) agency conflict of interest policies. Updated September 30, 2025.
A matrix that lists policies and requirements under the headings of: Disclosures, Agency Risk Assessment, FCOI & COC, Training, Certifications, and Research Security Program for each federal agency. Per COGR, this tool is frequently updated to reflect the release of new documentation. Updated September 30, 2025.
Published September 3, 2025, a National Academies Committee conducted an expedited study to examine federal research regulations and identify ways to improve regulatory processes and administrative tasks, reduce or eliminate unnecessary work, and modify and remove policies and regulations that have outlived their purpose while maintaining necessary and appropriate integrity, accountability, and oversight. Research security specific options include: implement the NSPM-33 common disclosure forms and disclosure table without deviation; establish common principles for agency research security risk reviews for fundamental research; continue prior efforts to streamline and clarify export controls; and adapt cybersecurity requirements for university settings.
Effective October 1, 2025, recipient institutions must train senior/key personnel on the requirement to disclose all research activities and affiliations in Other Support and maintain a 'written and enforced policy on requirements for the disclosure of other support to ensure Senior/Key Personnel fully understand their responsibility to disclose.'
Issued July 8, 2025. This memorandum: a. Requires all USDA Mission Areas, Agencies, and Offices to: i. Within 30 days, conduct a comprehensive review of all current USDA awards/subawards with foreign persons/entities and provide justification as to why a US recipient was not selected, ii. Effective immediately, request approval (including justification) prior to issuing an award/subaward to a foreign person/entity. b. Requires applicants (i.e., covered individuals) to: i. Complete the Common Forms for Biographical Sketches and Current and Pending (Other) Support and provide updated information annually, ii. Certify they are not a participant in a malign foreign talent recruitment program (MFTRP) and recertify annually, iii. Certify that they are not contracting with or providing benefit to any foreign person/entity in a country of concern, iv. Certify that they are not party to utilizing forced labor, v. Complete an annual disclosure of contracts associated with participation in programs sponsored by foreign governments/entities, vi. Seek approval from USDA to subaward any portion of a funded arrangement, including university students, post-doctoral fellows, and visiting researchers. c. Requires Employing Entities to: i. Certify to applicants' completion of research security training, ii. Prohibit applicants who either are currently or have in the past 10 years participated in MFTRPs from working on USDA projects, iii. Provide supporting documentation for foreign activities reported as current and pending support, iv. Review any documents required under the memorandum for compliance with USDA award terms and conditions.
Effective immediately (April 29, 2025), the SBIR and STTR Foreign Disclosure and Risk Management Requirements described in NOT-OD-23-139 and NOT-OD-24-029 may be applied to all active SBIR and STTR awards regardless of the due date the competing application was submitted. Recipients with active awards that did not undergo foreign risk assessment at the time of their original application may be required to disclose all funded and unfunded relationships with foreign countries, using the Required Disclosures of Foreign Affiliations or Relationships to Foreign Countries Form. If the recipient reports a covered foreign relationship that meets any of the risk criteria prohibiting funding, NIH may deem it necessary to terminate the award for material failure to comply with the federal statutes, regulations, or terms and conditions of the federal award.
Issued on August 8, 2024. Effective May 1, 2025, applicants are required to have a Digital Persistent Identifier or Persistent Identifier (PID) if: 1. Individuals are listed within financial assistance applications that will fund R&D activities, or technical assistance to support R&D activities; and 2. Individuals are required to submit Biographical Sketch and/or Current and Pending (Other) Support disclosure. A PID is defined as globally unique, persistent, machine resolvable and processable, and has an associated metadata schema (example: ORCID iD). PIDs must be provided in the Biographical Sketch and/or Current and Pending (Other) Support disclosures as part of the application. This requirement is optional until May 1, 2025, and mandatory thereafter.
August 2024. Assists agency staff in assessing grant applications and ongoing awards for potential foreign interference. Factors considered include: (1) current or past participation in a malign foreign talent recruitment program, which is prohibited by law, (2) undisclosed current or prior funding from a foreign country of concern (FCOC), or connected entity (currently China, Russia, North Korea, and Iran (higher risk)) or other foreign country (lower risk) and, (3) Indicators of an undisclosed current or past affiliation with an institution or entity located in or connected to a FCOC (higher-risk/mitigation) or foreign country (lower-risk/mitigation). Per the matrix, mitigation is either required, recommended, suggested, or not required based on the timing of the engagement and if accurate and complete disclosure information was provided. Mitigation conditions include: (1) specific award conditions, (2) modification of terms and conditions of award, (3) suspension, termination, or withdrawal of an award, (4) conversion from advance payment to reimbursement, and (5) recovery of funds.
June 2024. NSF initiated a proposal risk review process similar to that of DoD but with some notable differences. NSF's process will focus on critical technologies, beginning with a pilot of quantum technologies proposals in FY25, expanding to other key technologies in phase 2, and scaling up for all key technologies identified in the CHIPS and Science Act in phase 3. NSF will evaluate Three Criteria: 1. Appointments and positions with U.S. proscribed parties (e.g., U.S. BIS Entity List) and currently party to a MFTRP; 2. Non-disclosures of appointments, activities, and financial support; and 3. Potential foreseeable national security applications of the research. NSF will consider only current foreign appointments and affiliations and is not considering co-authorship in risk assessment.
A matrix developed to assist in determining if specific activities are required to be disclosed and what form is appropriate for reporting. Last updated May 2024.
Issued by the White House OSTP in February 2024, this policy requires federal agencies to use the Common Forms for current and pending support and biosketches, noting that NSF will serve as steward. Deviation from the common disclosure forms will require Office of Management and Budget (OMB)/Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) review and clearance under the Paperwork Reduction Act (PRA).
The common form for federal-wide biographical sketch disclosure, created as directed by NSPM-33 with NSF serving as steward. Includes certification by each senior/key person at the time of submission that they are not a party to a malign foreign talent recruitment program as defined in the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. As of November 2025, the form has been implemented by NSF and NASA.
The common form for federal-wide use for current and pending (other) support disclosure, created as directed by NSPM-33 with NSF serving as steward. The form includes certification by each senior/key person at the time of submission that they are not a party to a malign foreign talent recruitment program as defined in the CHIPS and Science Act of 2022. As of November 2025, the form has been implemented by NSF and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA).
Issued June 29, 2023 by DoD. The document includes: 1. A Policy on Risk-based Security Reviews of Fundamental Research, 2. A Decision Matrix to Inform Fundamental Research Proposal Mitigation (Amended May 5, 2025), 3. A list of foreign institutions identified as engaging in problematic activity (Part 3, Table 1, Amended June 24, 2025), and 4. A list of foreign talent recruitment programs identified as posing a threat to U.S. national security interests (Part 3, Table 2). The Decision Matrix contains four factors for assessing senior/key personnel disclosures: a. Participation in foreign talent recruitment programs, b. Current or prior funding from foreign countries of concern (FCOCs), c. Filing a patent in an FCOC or on behalf of an FCOC-connected entity without disclosure, and d. Associations or affiliations with organizations on U.S. Entity (trade restriction) and other indicated (U.S. restricted) lists.
The NSF Proposal and Award Policies and Procedures Guide (NSF 23-1, January 2023). Post-award Disclosure of Current Support and In-Kind Contribution Information: PAPPG Chapter II.D.2.h(ii).
Research security training developed by institutions and organizations under cooperative agreements funded by NSF in collaboration with the National Institutes of Health (NIH), Department of Energy (DoE), and Department of Defense (DoD), with engagement from the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The training consists of 4 modules: 1.) What is Research Security?; 2.) Disclosure; 3.) Manage and Mitigate Risk; 4.) International Collaboration.
September 2022. Requires agencies to implement a due diligence program to assess security risks for SBIR and STTR proposals. Disclosure requirements include information on foreign ties, business relationships, investment, and ownership. [Source: AAU, January 2024].
Expands the requirement for RCR training to include faculty and other senior personnel on [NSF] awards and expands the scope of such training to include mentoring training and training to raise awareness of research security risks as well as Federal export control, disclosure, and reporting requirements.
Authorizes the NSF OCRSSP, in coordination with the Office of Inspector General (OIG), to conduct risk assessments, including through the use of open-source analysis and analytical tools, of R&D award applications and disclosures to NSF.
White House OSTP / NSTC Research Security Subcommittee|
SupersededFederal
A January 2022 report by the White House OSTP/NSTC Research Security Subcommittee providing additional details on 1.) Disclosure Requirements and Standardization 2.) Persistent Identifiers 3.) Consequences for Violation of Disclosure Requirements 4.) Information Sharing and 5.) Research Security Programs. Largely superseded by the final July 9, 2024 guidelines.
White House OSTP / NSTC Research Security Subcommittee|
ActiveFederal
A Presidential Memorandum issued in January 2021 to strengthen protections of U.S. Government-supported R&D against foreign government interference and exploitation. It focuses on ensuring full disclosure of potential conflicts of interest and commitment by recipients of federal R&D and requires research institutions receiving over $50 million in federal R&D funding to certify they operate a research security program covering cybersecurity, foreign travel security, insider threat awareness, and export control training. As of November 2025, federal agencies continue to coordinate and work to implement this requirement for awardee institutions.
Signed January 3, 2020. Section 223 mandates disclosure of funding sources in applications for federal R&D awards and holds universities accountable for ensuring faculty awareness. Section 1299C is an amendment to FY 2019 NDAA Section 1286 requiring designation of an official responsible for liaising with academic institutions and briefing them on espionage risks. Section 1062 restricts DoD and NSF funds to institutions hosting a Confucius Institute. Section 9907 prohibits any funds for microelectronics initiatives to a foreign entity of concern.